21 May 2020 TO ALL MEMBERS Dear Sir or Madam Response to the US Global Maritime Advisory On 14 May 2020 the US issued a Global Maritime Advisory (“Guidance”) aimed at a range of industry sectors including marine insurers such as P&I Clubs and shipowners and charterers. A copy of the Guidance can be found here. The Guidance updates and expands earlier advisories concerning Iran, Syria and North Korea (“the DPRK”). The Guidance provides detail on the level of due diligence and other compliance related activities expected by the US Government of parties whose business activities run a risk of engaging in trades that may breach US sanctions. It applies specifically to the sanctions’ regimes surrounding Iran, Syria and the DPRK and provides information relevant to both US and non-US companies. The Guidance covers the following sectors of the maritime industry:  Marine Insurance  Flag Registry Managers  Port State Control Authorities  Shipping Industry Associations  Commodity Traders, Suppliers and Brokers  Financial Institutions  Shipowners, Operators and Charterers  Classification Societies  Vessel Captains  Crewing Companies The significance of the document lies in the fact that it represents an attempt by the US Government to set out the standards by which the marine industries will be judged if they are linked to sanctions breaking. In the past the US has been critical of the role played by the maritime industries in providing goods and services to countries that are the subject of sanctions. In several well publicised actions it has acted against companies where it considered that compliance practices have been inadequate or deliberate sanctions breaking was involved. The impact of such measures can have profound implications for a company and in extreme circumstances can prevent it from continuing to do business. - 2 To the extent that the Guidance clarifies US expectations of what it considers to be good compliance practice in the maritime industry it should be welcomed. Equally it is important to recognise that the sectors of the maritime industry targeted by the Guidance are often subject to complex domestic and international regulation that may impose conflicting requirements on a party. The resolution of these conflicts in areas such as competition law, data protection laws and international conventions such as The International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (“SOLAS”) are not addressed by the Guidance. The Guidance may also give rise to difficulties associated with the termination of legally binding commitments based on a suspicion of unlawful activity. By way of example, caution should be exercised before a shipowner or Club voluntarily discloses information to third party institutions or organisations, private or public, unless directed to do so by a proper authority in the jurisdiction in which business interests are regulated. For a Club based in the UK, for example, the Club’s regulator or sanctions enforcement agency may direct it to disclose information on an entered vessel according to the rules stipulated by the Club’s supervisory body, other proper authority or sanctions enforcement agency. A Club voluntarily reporting to commercial databases, for example, may lead to a breach of relevant data protection or competition law. Of particular note is the focus on the use – or misuse – of a vessel’s AIS equipment. All those engaged in the maritime industry can now be in no doubt as to the importance of monitor