Maritime Reader

NEWS INTELLIGENCE ARCHIVE
03 AUG 2026 MONDAY
Advanced filters
Keywords | type to search… Date: All time Sources: All Topics: All
A loaded cargo vessel was outbound under pilotage in daylight and moderate visibility. A tug was in attendance but was released once the vessel was past the port breakwaters. About seven minutes after the tug departed the vessel, visibility unexpectedly reduced to about 200m. The vessel was at a speed of six knots, and over the next two minutes the pilot gave helm orders to make a 44 degree port turn out to sea (see diagram). The vessel turned further to port than desired. Once the pilot realised this, he gave starboard helm orders, but it was too late. The vessel grounded outside the buoyed channel about four minutes after the first port helm order was given. Attempts to use ship’s power to return to the channel were fruitless and salvage tugs were needed. The investigation found, among other things, that the vessel lacked a complete voyage plan to exit the harbour (ie courses, safety distances, clearing bearings, rate of turn etc.) and that the pilot was navigating primarily by visual means. When the visibility unexpectedly reduced, the bridge team were at a disadvantage. No one on the bridge was in control of the progress of the 44 degree port turn by electronic means such as ECDIS or radar. Lessons learned A shared plan is a safer plan. In this case, the plan was in the pilot’s head, much as we saw in MARS 202153. Even with a pilot on board a Master should ensure courses are put on the chart or ECDIS and OOWs are closely following the progress of the vessel. Visual navigation in fog is a recipe for an accident. When in doubt, slow down if possible. In this case the vessel was at six knots which is not that fast – except they didn’t have good situational awareness. At 4 knots they would have had 50% more time to evaluate. Disclaimer : The information on this website is for general purposes only. While efforts are made to ensure accuracy, we make no warranties of any kind regarding completeness, reliability, or suitability. Any reliance you place on such information is at your own risk. We are not liable for any loss or damage arising from the use of this website. Related Posts Real Life Incident: Collision Of Container Ship and General Cargo Ship Leads To Sinking And Fatalities Real Life Incident: Collision and Sinking of Small Craft in Shipping Lane Real Life Incident: Crew Saved but Ship Lost Real Life Incident: Pin Holes Create Pathway To Fatal Reckoning Related Posts Real Life Incident: Collision Of Container Ship and General Cargo Ship Leads To Sinking And Fatalities Real Life Incident: Collision and Sinking of Small Craft in Shipping Lane Real Life Incident: Crew Saved but Ship Lost Disclaimer : The information on this website is for general purposes only. While efforts are made to ensure accuracy, we make no warranties of any kind regarding completeness, reliability, or suitability. Any reliance you place on such information is at your own risk. We are not liable for any loss or damage arising from the use of this website. Related Articles Real Life Incident: Collision Of Container Ship and General Cargo Ship Leads To Sinking And Fatalities Real Life Incident: Collision and Sinking of Small Craft in Shipping Lane Real Life Incident: Crew Saved but Ship Lost Latest News Real Life Incident: Pin Holes Create Pathway To Fatal Reckoning Real Life Incident: Engine Cadet Loses Life Due To Fumigation Real Life Incident: Poisoning From Fumigant Takes Lives Of Chief And Third Officers Real Life Incident: Engine Room Crew Member Dies Bec
← Back to latest
casualty_report Marine Insight ·2025-04-20

Real Life Incident: Unexpected Fog Throws Bridge Team into Disarray

Marine Insight
Read full article at Marine Insight →
Opens Marine Insight in a new tab

Topics & segments

← Back to latest

Related Knowledge

Documents on the same topic from the archive